Tony Bell: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
What am I doing? If you watch either of these you will see.<br> | What am I doing? If you watch either of these you will see.<br> | ||
I really want to crack this, and I think it can be done | I really want to crack this, and I think it can be done before too long. <br> | ||
Also, I believe we ''must'' solve these problems. <br> | |||
I know this is not a common view, but still, I think it is correct. | I know this is not a common view, but still, I think it is correct. | ||
Revision as of 08:47, 9 September 2010
Anthony J. Bell Ph.D.
Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience
UC Berkeley
132 Barker, MC #3190
Berkeley, CA 94720-3190
phone (415) 699 6502
fax (510) 643-4952
tbell@berkeley.edu
Research Interest
It's 2010.
Here's my Salk web-page from way back.
Here's me giving a 30 minute talk Levels, Time and Models about Levels in Biology.
Here's me giving a 85 minute talk Emergence and Submergence in the Nervous System.
(The production on the latter is not so good, so here are the slides.
Also, a few minutes in, the audio drastically improves.)
What am I doing? If you watch either of these you will see.
I really want to crack this, and I think it can be done before too long.
Also, I believe we must solve these problems.
I know this is not a common view, but still, I think it is correct.
There are 3 steps to uniting physics, biology and machine learning:
(1) Solve the time series density estimation problem
(2) Solve the sensory-motor problem
(3) Solve the levels problem
The clues to (2) and (3) lie in (1).
I am working on (1) and I think I've just about got it.
And unfortunately there's no way around it: we are going to have to absorb and augment
the emerging non-equilibrium statistical mechanics and (cough) quantum theory.
Here's an unsatisfactory paper Towards a cross-level theory of neural learning that explains what I was thinking up till about 2008.